| /* SPDX-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.1+ */ |
| #include "sd-bus.h" |
| |
| #include "main-func.h" |
| #include "tests.h" |
| |
| static int test_ref_unref(void) { |
| sd_bus_message *m = NULL; |
| sd_bus *bus = NULL; |
| int r; |
| |
| /* This test will result in a memory leak in <= v240, but not on v241. Hence to be really useful it |
| * should be run through a leak tracker such as valgrind. */ |
| |
| r = sd_bus_open_system(&bus); |
| if (r < 0) |
| return log_tests_skipped("Failed to connect to bus"); |
| |
| /* Create a message and enqueue it (this shouldn't send it though as the connection setup is not complete yet) */ |
| assert_se(sd_bus_message_new_method_call(bus, &m, "foo.bar", "/foo", "quux.quux", "waldo") >= 0); |
| assert_se(sd_bus_send(bus, m, NULL) >= 0); |
| |
| /* Let's now unref the message first and the bus second. */ |
| m = sd_bus_message_unref(m); |
| bus = sd_bus_unref(bus); |
| |
| /* We should have a memory leak now on <= v240. Let's do this again, but destory in the opposite |
| * order. On v240 that too should be a leak. */ |
| |
| r = sd_bus_open_system(&bus); |
| if (r < 0) |
| return log_tests_skipped("Failed to connect to bus"); |
| |
| assert_se(sd_bus_message_new_method_call(bus, &m, "foo.bar", "/foo", "quux.quux", "waldo") >= 0); |
| assert_se(sd_bus_send(bus, m, NULL) >= 0); |
| |
| /* Let's now unref things in the opposite order */ |
| bus = sd_bus_unref(bus); |
| m = sd_bus_message_unref(m); |
| |
| return 0; |
| } |
| |
| static int run(int argc, char *argv[]) { |
| int r; |
| |
| test_setup_logging(LOG_INFO); |
| |
| r = test_ref_unref(); |
| if (r < 0) |
| return r; |
| |
| return 0; |
| } |
| |
| DEFINE_MAIN_FUNCTION(run); |